Which is cheaper, Nippon India Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?

Nippon India Value Fund has the lower expense ratio: Nippon India Value Fund charges 0.91% p.a. vs UTI Value Fund's 1.22% p.a..

Which fund performed better recently?

Over roughly the last year, Nippon India Value Fund moved -1.4% vs UTI Value Fund's -3.9% in NAV. Past performance doesn't guarantee future returns.

How is this different from the Fund Overlap tool?

Fund Overlap compares what these two funds actually HOLD in common. This page compares the funds themselves — cost, size, manager, and returns. See the "Holdings overlap" link below for the holdings-level view.

Is this investment advice?

No. WhoHolds surfaces public data for comparison. It is not investment advice and we are not a SEBI-registered adviser.

Fund comparison

Nippon India Value Fund vs UTI Value Fund

Nippon India MF · ValueUTI MF · Value· as on May 2026

Metric	Nippon India Value Fund	UTI Value Fund
Category	Value	Value
Fund manager	Meenakshi Dawar; Dhrumil Shah; Kinjal Desai; Amber Singhania	Amit Premchandani
AUM	—	—
Expense ratio	0.91% p.a.	1.22% p.a.
Latest NAV	₹247.40	₹180.47
~1-year NAV return	-1.4%	-3.9%
Equity holdings	75	60

Highlighted values mark the stronger side per metric (lower expense ratio, higher AUM/holdings/return). Not a recommendation.

See their holdings overlap →

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nippon India Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?: Nippon India Value Fund has the lower expense ratio: Nippon India Value Fund charges 0.91% p.a. vs UTI Value Fund's 1.22% p.a..
Which fund performed better recently?: Over roughly the last year, Nippon India Value Fund moved -1.4% vs UTI Value Fund's -3.9% in NAV. Past performance doesn't guarantee future returns.
How is this different from the Fund Overlap tool?: Fund Overlap compares what these two funds actually HOLD in common. This page compares the funds themselves — cost, size, manager, and returns. See the "Holdings overlap" link below for the holdings-level view.
Is this investment advice?: No. WhoHolds surfaces public data for comparison. It is not investment advice and we are not a SEBI-registered adviser.

Related comparisons

Data from each fund's latest public disclosure and AMFI NAV history. ~1-year return is a simple NAV price change, not an annualized CAGR. Not investment advice.